Back in the ’80s when I was birthing my first child, it was difficult to find a doctor who would agree to the kind of experience I wanted.
My idea of birthing was one in which I did all the work, and the midwife or doctor stood by in case I needed them. No drugs. No procedures. No interference.
I did everything I knew to make that happen.
But just moments before I gave birth to our first child, a vigorous discussion with the OBGYN ensued while I was in transition.
You might know about transition: the component of birthing where you wonder if you’ll make it because it’s the most rigorous and painful phase of childbirth. Mine turned into a debate with hospital staff, thank you very much.
“Why don’t you want a Vitamin K shot for your baby?” the nurses and doctor grilled relentlessly.
I confess that I don’t have much confidence in hospitals and their procedures. It’s not that I think they’re scalawags; it’s that I don’t trust a measurable amount of medical research and the subsequent practice based on it.
Of all the interventions, in my considered opinion, Vitamin K injection was one of the most superfluous, particularly given the homework I had done.
What I Learned
As usual, the arguments in favor of injecting a newborn with a Vitamin K shot and those against contradict each other. Not unlike most medical squabbles, after reading both sides, you wonder how medical science could be called scientific.
The reason Vitamin K is considered at birth is that low levels of it are blamed for…..
Author: Joette Calabrese, HMC, CCH, RSHom(Na)