Former President Barack Obama and the Clintons have been caught red-handed after evidence suggests that it was them all along — and now the truth has been revealed to the nation.
Over the weekend, the New York Times published a hit piece against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and attempted to reignite old allegations that have already been proven to be completely false.
The Times did its best to hide the “source” of their hit piece, but now we know exactly who is behind the latest hatchet job against Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh’s latest accuser, Max Stier, worked on former President Bill Clinton’s impeachment defense team during the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
Max Stier, the man behind a new sexual misconduct allegation against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, was not only a former classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Yale but also a foe during the Bill Clinton impeachment trial.
Stier, 53, served on the team defending Clinton, while Kavanaugh served on Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr’s team that was investigating Clinton.
He donated $250 to the Democratic National Committee in 2000 while he worked at Housing and Urban Development, and then donated about $1,000 to former President Barack Obama in 2007 and 2008.
Kavanaugh worked for Special Prosecutor Ken Starr’s team and helped lead the investigation into President Clinton’s crimes and admitted affair with Lewinsky, who served as a White House intern at the time.
Stier — a top Clinton ally — is the source for the latest NYT hit piece against Kavanaugh.
When it comes to the Clintons, very little happens randomly — they are calculated and hold grudges, so it’s certainly possible that they are trying it get back at Kavanaugh.
Stier’s accusation stems from a new book called, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation,” in which the authors, Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, claim that Stier saw Kavanaugh expose himself to Deborah Martinez back in the 1980s.
“A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student,” wrote the authors in a New York Times piece previewing their book.
After the NYT published its hit piece, the liberal outlet walked back an explosive report about a resurfaced allegation of sexual assault by Kavanaugh from his college days.
The Times piece alleged there was corroboration of an incident in which Kavanaugh, as a college student at Yale, exposed himself to a female classmate at a party.
The hit piece collapsed almost immediately.
Hours after it was published, a Times editors’ note added a significant detail to the piece admitting that several friends of the alleged victim said she did not recall the purported sexual assault in question at all.
The Times also stated for the first time that the alleged victim had refused to be interviewed and has made no comment about the episode.
The only firsthand statement concerning the supposed attack in the original piece, which was published on Saturday, came from a Stier, the Clinton-connected lawyer who claimed to have witnessed it.
The Times salacious piece — which has been proven to be totally false — stemmed from Ford’s allegations against Kavanaugh last year.
Ford alleged that Kavanaugh groped her at a high school pool party around 1982.
When grilled and pressed for any evidence to support her claims, Ford couldn’t find anyone or anything to substantiate her shoddy allegations.
After delaying his confirmation hearing a week to appease Democratic lawmakers, the FBI conducted a supplemental background check at the time and found that there was no support for the allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh.
The U.S. Senate confirmed Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court by a vote tally of 50-48.
Kavanaugh was able to survive an all-out smear campaign and has a lifetime appointment on the nation’s highest court.
But Democrats are refusing to give up and continue to conjure up new pathetic ideas to take him down.